I like where AMD is trying out some serious new technology with HBM, and they got it out a year before NVidia is supposed to get their own variant out, but I know I could use a new GPU now. I'm just wanting to run the game at those higher settings that a better GPU could handle, just debating between the two camps. :P I quite enjoy it on 3440x1440, and the text honestly isn't too bad for me. Oh, I already play FF XIV, idk if you missed that part. Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings. Should add, when I was using AMD 7970, the game ran just fine but that was prior to the DX11 client but it did not stress that GPU really in dungeon or instance content, theres still the crowded FPS drops that every mmo suffers from. You can also try the trial also which I think was for 7 days? Transparent lighting and HBAO+ (nvidia onlythough) and tesselation will incur some frame drops, but really thats all, the tesselation is not that heavy in this game, you will get by SSAO just fine. (Before anyone mentions, yes I had everything on the largest UI size setting and its still tiny). However a huge word of warning, this game suffers from massive text scaling issues at higher res, the only reason why I am not downsampling anymore is due to the piss poor text scaling, this game is highly optimised it seems for 1920x1080. If you get the GPU, there is a Heavensward benchmark for DX11, you can test it out on that and the performance is somewhat comparable on there to the game live.Īlso I have tried DX9 settings before DX11 came along on my Nvidia 780, and it can handle 60 FPS in dungeon content when I downsampled from 3440x1440. Without an appropriate social media marketing strategy, Nvidia will probably lose considerable market share, for all the wrong reasons.Its Nvidias own SSAO deltrus, its slightly more eye candy but otherwise it does run fine on AMD, game is slightly favoured towards Nvidia non the less. Their marketing infrastructure outsold Intel in the CPU market despite a 15% performance deficit. Nonetheless, AMD’s marketers are capable of delivering elaborate BS albeit whilst struggling to keep a straight face. In terms of real world performance, Nvidia’s 3000 series has more or less put AMD’s Radeon group in checkmate. The combination of RTX+DLSS delivers stunning graphics that are several tiers higher than both AMD's best discrete GPUs and the upcoming consoles. It makes GTA5 look like Tetris in comparison. At ultra settings, with ray tracing enabled, Cyberpunk 2077 redefines the boundaries of immersive gaming. Meanwhile PC gamers can look forward to an unparalleled gaming experience in class leading titles such as Cyberpunk 2077. Given the widespread issues AMD users are facing with 5000 series GPUs (blue/black screens etc.), AMD’s 6000 series GPU’s will have to see substantial price cuts and a huge marketing effort in order to gain any traction. The 3060 offers similar performance to the previous generation’s 2060 Super at an 18% MSRP discount. The 3060 features 3,584 CUDA cores, 112 Tensor cores, it has a boost clock of 1.78 GHz, 12 GB of memory and a power draw of just 170 W. Nvidia’s new Ampere architecture, which supersedes Turing, offers both improved power efficiency and performance. Even if it (ever…) comes into stock at $330 USD, it will struggle to match the groundbreaking 3060 Ti in terms of value for money. The RTX 3060 is Nvidia’s latest 3000 series GPU.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |